CO129-206 - Public Offices & Others - 1882 — Page 391

386

you circumstantially andin subitance the same statement as those which are embodied in the petition of the plaintiff to the Supreme Court,

which were taken from my navrakic of what occure, during my meeting with Dr Eitel on the 20th September.

You would greatly akligi

me, if you

whether

would fell one

not this

Should you

The petition,

of it for you.

You

WO

the

© COAL

not have scen

can obtain a

very truely

copy

(Signed) J. Buckeley Johnson.

Al Justice Russell.

1 December 1881.

A Jevtice Kussell

h

I. B. Johnson.

My dear Johnson,

In reply to your

be of

you

-

This morning, Fregret to state that what hair been informed is quite trees - viz: that Dr Eitel made a statement to me, nearly a month before the 201 September, which was substantially the same as that set out in the & the paragraph of the petition in the

of Hayllar

are.

Eitel.

Jam all ho answer

question at once; as

your

the

Cas

FLOU

withdrawn or rather notion of

withdrawal